This portrait fascinated me from a very early age.

The Mulatto Woman

By Jay Myrdal

This pastel portrait still hangs on my living room wall. It has been in my family since my father Bud created it in 1939, four years before I was born. It has always been known in the Myrdal clan as “The Mulatto Woman”. The painting has fascinated me from a very young age.

I must explain here that the world has changed, evolved if you like, and words have evolved with it. Even in the relatively short space of 80 some years we have become much more aware of people’s feelings and as such, some words are considered offensive and no longer used. The word mulatto falls into this category but it has fallen out of use; so far out of use in fact, that most people don’t even know what it means.

According to my Android Merriam Webster: mulatto

1 now sometimes offensive: the first-generation offspring of a black person and a white person

2 now sometimes offensive: a person of mixed white and black ancestry

First Known use

1591

History and Etymology

Spanish mulato, from mule/ from Latin mulus

Reading the etymology above it is not at all surprising that it is sometimes offensive today. In fact, it was probably very offensive in 1591 and without doubt was still offensive 1939 when my father painted this portrait, but few people cared at the time.

I sincerely apologize for any offence caused by using the word here. Nevertheless, I felt it was necessary, because the painting and its name are the focus for this whole blog.

What struck me about this painting, even at a young age, was how sad and forlorn the woman seems to be. I never asked my dad about the session, but the painting says it all, or at least it does to me. If I may I would like to speculate on the sitter in this intriguing portrait.

I imagine that this poor woman is an outcast. Being “of colour” she was not accepted in White society but very sadly, because of her mixed-race background, she was not accepted by Black society either. This, according to my parents, was the fate of mixed-race people even as late as the 1940s.

With this in mind, I try to see more into the painting, and I believe I can see the actual person modelling for my 21-year-old dad in 1939.

She was poor and found it difficult to find work. It is likely that one of the few accessible types of work on offer to her was art school modelling. In the 1930s, God fearing America did not see exposing your body, even for art, as a respectable job, and few would have done it willingly.

She poses there quietly, breast exposed, just waiting for the session to be over. My father is a very accurate portrait painter, as is obvious from the many fine examples, in oil, of very recognizable members of our family, but getting the perfect result takes time in oil. The method here is different, he is using pastel chalk which is a very hands-on material. The marks are made quickly and with great skill. Up close, the marks look like nothing but from a foot or two away the few black scribbles morph into swirling curls and waves which perfectly represent her hair.

She is an experience model but is anxious to get home to her two small children, a boy, and a girl whom she has left in the care of her Irish mother in the small timber house they share in a poorer part of town. She doesn’t like leaving them too long and is careful to hold her position so that he has no need to reposition her and waste time.

Bud traces again the strong slope of her neck, bent forward from years of oppression, both social and physical. He is just tiding up now and deftly defines her right areola using slight, almost imperceptibly tiny marks with a small flesh coloured pastel.

I look again at her breasts. Perhaps I was wrong about the children. Her nipples look very young, even nubile. It seems unlikely that any baby has suckled these innocent mounds. Now that I look closer, her whole body is young. I had imagined, looking at her face, that she was in her late twenties, even mid-thirties, but her body doesn’t agree. Is it that she is in fact still a teenager, her face aged by a life much harder than any of us have had to lead? I look again, even more closely this time. Perhaps she is a teenager, given her racial statis, the hard life would not be so hard to understand.

Bud is nearly finished now, he rubs her right eyebrow with his little finger to smooth it slightly and satisfied, steps back for a final overall look.

“That’s all done” he says, “It has worked out really well, one of my best, I’m sure it will make my next exhibition.”

She pulls the wrap around her shoulders and covers her breasts as she steps down from the dais and moves toward him — they shake hands. My father was a well-known womanizer in his later years, and I doubt that began suddenly at the age of thirty-five. Nevertheless, I expect he behaved very professionally as an art student, and she collected her money, got dressed and left the building. I am unaware whether he knew her name, but the painting is now, and ever will be known as, “The Mulatto Woman”, unless the name itself becomes so objectionable that it can no longer be expressed by polite society.

The importance of judging things only by the standards of their time.

The above story brings us conveniently into the basic point of this blog. The importance of judging things by their own standards. The world continues to change of course. Today the term mulatto has lost its meaning but so too has the definition. Mixed race people are much more common now than they were in nineteen thirty-nine. I am beginning to believe that the new colour for the century will be Brown or perhaps Caramel, a term I have heard used in recent years. My observation recently is that many modern kids and young adults in Southern England, have friends and partners of all colours, hardly noticing the . Of course, I am fortunate to live in a very multi cultured country which makes an enormous difference.

Times have changed a great deal in just my modest lifetime, largely for the better I believe. Many practices which were normal when I was a teenager in the 1950s would be completely unacceptable today. In a few short decades we have gone from the belt in the woodshed to the naughty corner; from arrest and conviction to LGBTQ parades. There is little need for me to list all the hundreds of changes, or new freedoms (yes that is what they are) because they are all around us. These new attitudes are already entwined in our modern, evolving society. I applaud these changes. I am fully happy and content with the new standards, WOKE if you like, and I am very happy they continue to be observed. What I believe is very wrong is using these new standards to make judgements about past generations.

Before pointing out what I believe to be unjustified conclusions about historical characters, arrived at by judging them by modern standards, I would like to image how things might be in the future.

Today there are increasing members of our society becoming vegan. Many are even giving up all animal products, often for emotional reasons but for environmental reasons as well. There are growing numbers of people who would like to see animal exploitation like horse racing and even show jumping banned because of the high percentage of injury and death these horses suffer each year. There are, in our society today, a reasonable number of people who disagree with the exploitation of animals in any way.

These are valid individual opinions, present in our society today, but they are in comparatively small numbers and don’t really have much influence when it comes to a person being elected to a high public office or rising to some other prominent position. Not today anyway, not in the year 2022.

Step into the time machine.

It is now 2222. Two hundred years later. The migration to veganism is complete and total respect of animals has progressed to the point that killing, eating, abusing, or even owning an animal is not only banned in law but completely unacceptable in proper society.

The successful experiments in the twenty first century have progressed with leaps and bounds thanks to quantum computers, and it has become possible to properly communicate with animals. It has even been discovered that some species of whales and dolphins are more intelligent than the average human. Jonathan Swift’s Houyhnhnms have become a reality..

Some people are asking to ban a book and destroy a statue depicting an historical Queen of England, Elizabeth II, because she ate meat, kept dogs and, worst of all, owned and raced horses!

What are we to do? Our twenty third century society finds these abhorrent practices a complete anathema. What is the answer?

Perhaps an idea might be to replace the Elizabeth II statue with a contemporary hero. Perhaps our recently applauded Cetacean Ambassador? We could then move the two-hundred-year-old queen into a suitable museum, complete with information describing her many qualities and accomplishments, good and bad, while explaining that, however much we might be disgusted by the thought, carnivorism and horse racing were very common in the 20th and 21st century.

I had intended to go on to make comparisons and present examples of the afore mentioned unjustified judgements, but I don’t think it is really necessary now. You can fill in the blanks yourselves. You know what I am talking about.

Some people are trying to look back, from our modern perspective, onto a world which can’t conform to our viewpoint because that viewpoint doesn’t yet exist for them. Our perspective simply can’t be seen. It is yet to evolve.

What is necessary to remember is that these societies were not living by today’s standards. They were living by the standards of their day which were, no doubt, different to the standards of their forbearers and different again to their forbearers and so forth. How could it be any other way?

Note: I nearly didn’t publish the above story because of the title. I was unsure if the term Mulatto wasn’t best left forgotten. Perhaps the very act of writing and publishing these thoughts could open a rift in the literary firmament and allow back into being, a hugely offensive and long dead label which, like the legendary Egyptian mummy, could return to wreak havoc on our modern woke world. My colleagues have assured me that the likelihood of the above is zero so publish and be dammed.

Jay  –   June 2022 ..  18 ed230822

You are welcome to post a comment. I won't remove them unless they are offensive.

4 Comments

Simon
June 12, 2022 11:06 pm

This is very thoughtful, sensitively expressed and worth a fair hearing. Thanks Jay.

Jay
June 12, 2022 11:48 pm

Thanks Simon. I’m nearly 80 years old and so many practices I grew up with would be unecptable today.

Bill Moore
September 2, 2022 8:52 pm

Well stated Jay and the word “mullato” used sensitively, I believe is unfreighted. There may be some to whom its a badge as a black and white couple often send bystanders “gaga” with the beauty of the offspring. I have known men who have chosen partners very carefully just for that result.
As for the rest – what was the past really! What will the future hold. For me just embrace the unknown.

Jay Myrdal
September 2, 2022 11:11 pm

The UK has come a long way in the last few years colour wise. As I said above, many young people, at least in the south of England, no longer really take much notice of colour. Lots of couples are mixed race and have, as you noted, beautiful children..